WebSadhu

Today, the scientists and almost everybody on earth believe that humans have been gifted with this power of reasoning, analyzing and arguing to conclude and gain knowledge. We have an intrinsic desire to learn and know which is nothing but intent of the mind to comprehend whatever is there in the universe. We are wondering at the marvel that has happened. Marvel of being born and alive and then question. Marvel of this universe. Marveling and wondering is the direct result of being in touch with the energies of the universe that is again us. We are same as this energy. And somewhere in this happening, something has evolved called mind. Mind naturally is the gift to men to survive in the ferocious world of the past where we didn't have enough strength to fight the giant and dangerous animals. Now, this very mind that helped us survive is hindering our growth. Just like the dinosaurs who because of their size and strength once dominated the earth, and this very size and strength became the weakness that led to their downfall, we are hindered by our mind. Look at 2 people and you will soon realize that the instinct to dominate and put the other person down (just like in animals) is still present. We have just become little sophisticated in terms of language and expression and unconscious, but the animal instinct is still there. And then came the Darwin who said that only the fittest survive. And the earth has seen the evolution of the best. But, somewhere we became too dependent on mind, and the mind, which was meant to help us survive on the material plane, is now binding us down to the material plane. And this is hindering our development and evolution.

Somehow we have missed something. We have identified ourselves too much with the mind. And this identification, we have ceased to realize that there is another possibility of evolution for humans. The possibility that always was there. I see a big FLAW in theory of evolution of Darwin as is understood by humans. Looking at the past 3000 years, we don't see that humans have evolved. And there is no evolution. People may argue at computers and technology. But, this is not evolution, only an extension of the same old animal instinct to survive, extension of the same old mind. Technology being the survival instinct of the cooperates. We didn't need cars or coca-colas or computers. They were all cooperates survival tools which finally made their way into the unconsciousness of the humanity.

Coming back to Darwin theory which was the considered to be the cause of many wars and as is believed by many contemporaries (especially Europeans) of our times and past, the theory is right when looked from the material or animalistic point of view. But, it misses a major portion of truth and reality that nature does not always favor the best or the strong, but nature favors change. And this change can be in any direction. It can lead to the evolution of humans as a specie or demolition of any other specie. Hitler believed that Germans would survive and would win the war, since they belong to superior race. But, that didn't happen. What works in a war? Why somebody wins and the other loses is a direct result of intent which is a sum total of the intent due to universe and past actions (through mind or body).

Here, by discussing all this, I am not proposing any theory, 'coz the universe is too vast for any theory. Universe is full of contradictions and something might work at some place and might be defied at the other place. It depends on the context and the world is an interplay of energies (which I prefer to call intent). What seem as a theory now is a result of some past interactions of intents and thus, is valid in current context. It gives no guarantee that it would be valid in the future as well.

Here, I want to question Darwin theory that has entered into the unconscious of the humanity and has been taken for granted by all. It has influenced us too much. Humans have not evolved out of sheer superiority, but many other reasons too. Had this been the case, humanity would have shown sigh of improvement of evolution in the last 3000 years. And we haven't evolved. And the reason why I can say, we have not evolved is that their is something else that is superior to mind and has not been accepted in last 3000 years. Humans carry an extraordinary tendency to observe the energy of the universe directly as it flows in the universe. And this gives us a prowess that is unknown to us, to know, to comprehend the unknowable, to know and expand still more. This gives us direct access into the intent that eventually governs the whole universe. The universe is nothing, but interplay of these intents. Therefore, somewhere the Darwin theory is flawed and there is nowhere to go. And the belief that the best survives is only a thought too naive to be applied to the context of humanity. It is difficult to figure out the definition of the ‘best’ that is often explained as the most adaptable. This definition does make sense. But, what is adaptable then? Ability of the specie to understand, comprehend and then adapt to the circumstances. And in this context, it is perfectly right. And therefore, it is right. And in order for humans to survive we need superior tool and power to understand the world around that cannot be done with mind alone.

Our too much dependency on the mind can result in the downfall of us as the specie. We have better tools at our disposal. And that is by understanding no-mind, Tao or dis identification with mind.

Darwin theory is a direct consequence of intent of the being to survive. And the being with the strongest intent (that is a some total of universe and his past energy) survives. If the specie loses the intent to survive, it sooner or later has to give way to the change that is always happening in the universe. Intent of the specie (that includes the power to adapt) is riding this change in the universe. Once the mind was an ideal tool to help and comprehend. Now mind has fallen short to help us grow and evolve.